|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
182
   |
Posted - 2011.09.06 14:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Since we have a new forum, let's move the old discussion over here.
Here's what's already been said.
I'm sure that CCP will be posting an update here very shortly.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 08:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:Nin Kimrov wrote:CCP, I'm really sure you missed the round table for FW. I know, you through the table was in the bar with the sexy girls in it. Don't worry, I would have done the same thing. Round table is in Rodj's CQ next year - that's assuming anyone other then him can get into them by then 
Minmatars are only allowed in if they're accompanied by a responsible adult.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
182
|
Posted - 2011.09.07 09:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Cyzlaki wrote:No one cares. I do. CCP mayhaps not, or not so you'd notice. Rodj Blake wrote:Har Harrison wrote:Round table is in Rodj's CQ next year - that's assuming anyone other then him can get into them by then Minmatars are only allowed in if they're accompanied by a responsible adult. NEVER, go into rodj CQ, alternativly, never invite him to yours. Terrible things happen... :(
I already apologised for doing those things to you whilst you were in a drunken stupor. 
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
184
|
Posted - 2011.09.12 13:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well, at least we now know that CCP don't have any plans to remove FW.
But just what are CCP planning?
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
200
|
Posted - 2011.09.13 16:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Somebody is clearly bumping the Faction Warfare thread, I approve. Really? Who is that I wonder???
I just can't imagine who it could be.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
207
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 08:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:Rodj Blake wrote:Har Harrison wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:Somebody is clearly bumping the Faction Warfare thread, I approve. Really? Who is that I wonder??? I just can't imagine who it could be. You???
Not me. I would never gratuitously bump a thread in the forlorn hope that a dev might see it.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
223
|
Posted - 2011.09.14 15:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:He was supposed to make a reply when he got home from Russia several months ago. One can only assume that he has been arrested for espionage and/or lewd behaviour and therefore stuck in Russia indefinitely .. because the alternative is that CCP are lying through their teeth, making empty promises left and right in the hopes of making us go away - and that cannot be :ccpawesome:
Perhaps we could club together and hire a lawyer to get him released?
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
245
|
Posted - 2011.09.20 07:26:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:Post downtime plexing fleets are awesome, done in combat capable ships and both sides generally willing to engage unless there is a large number discrepancy (or small depending on FC  ).
And there lies one of the problems with FW.
Because the plex spawning mechanic is so badly thought out, if you're not on just after DT you're left asking yourself "what's the point?"
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
257
|
Posted - 2011.09.23 12:29:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Bengal Bob wrote:Cearain wrote:
Being able to quickly react with the minimum force necessary to get the job done will be key in this sort of warfare.
No disrespect to all three of you amarr that do try for fair fights, but I can't even get a fight in a frigate anymore even against the odds without it turning out to be a trap  - not even frigs v frigs, but bc and all sorts waiting for me to aggress. "I am here" beacons will mean that if someone comes into your plex, it is almost certain they already have someone(many) waiting on the other side of the gate. We are after the same goal here. If plexes are constantly being run throughout the 4 regions each front has, then the militias that refuse to split up their blobs will lose occupancy. Consider this: Militia A and militia B both have 30 active pilots doing plexing. Militia A insists on keeping all of its pilots together in a large blob all doing one plex. Miltia B spreads their pilots out into 30 different systems each one doing a plex. ItGÇÖs easy to see that Militia B will have allot more plexes captured. Even on a smaller scale this is true. If militia A must send 2 pilots to dislodge every single pilot from militia B then they better have at least 2xs as many pilots or they will not win the occupancy war. If the plexing mechanic was really done right militias would use the minimum number necessary to take each plex.
People will also be encouraged to go plexing if there was an actual point to holding occupancy.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
268
|
Posted - 2011.09.27 13:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
You go a long way towards preventing the snowball effect if you make it progressively harder to capture systems. The first enemy system is easy to take and hold. The tenth less so. The thirtieth almost impossible.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
|
|
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
288
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 18:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Also:
CCP Hellmar wrote:Factional warfare needs to be fixed
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
297
|
Posted - 2011.10.07 10:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:I honestly hate the idea of plexes, unless they are generated by players who decide to attack a certain system and thus setup a plex/forward command bases to start the invasion/start to take the system.
Having random plexes spawn about to orbit while they are capturing the flag with an npc or two present is of 0 interest to me. Purpose, focus and player management is.
So it should be possible to do something that triggers an incursion-type event in system X?
I am intrigued by your idea, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
344
|
Posted - 2011.10.25 16:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP Spitfire wrote:CCP Soundwave has been posting some ideas in this thread
I'm sorry Spitfire, but wanting to remove faction NPCs from high-sec does not count as "some ideas"
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori. |
|
|
| |
|